Image caption 2: Evolution of oxygen (left) and manganese (right) in the solar neighborhood of the Milky Way Galaxy. The x-axis shows the metallicity (iron abundance relative to hydrogen), which is a proxy of time increasing from the left to right. The y-axis shows the oxygen and manganese abundances, relative to iron. The points are for the elemental abundances observed in nearby stars with high-resolution spectroscopy. From the comparison, it is found that at least 75 percent of Type Ia supernovae are near-Chandrasekhar mass ex-plosions. A research team at the Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics
of the Universe (Kavli IPMU) consisting of Visiting Scientist Chiaki
Kobayashi, Project Researcher at the time Shing-Chi Leung (currently at
the California Institute of Technology), and Senior Scientist Ken’ichi
Nomoto have used computer simulations to follow the explosion, nuclear
reaction, production of elements, and evolution of elemental abundances
in galaxies. As a result, they placed stringent constraints on the
origin of Type Ia supernovae.
A Type Ia supernova is a type of supernova that is
not related to the death of a massive star. Instead, a Type Ia
supernova is a luminous explosion of a star that occurs in a binary
system, where two relatively low-mass stars are evolving together.
Because of their relatively constant luminosity, Type Ia supernovae have
been used as a standard “candle” to measure the expansion of the
universe, a result for which the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics was
awarded. However, the progenitor star of a Type Ia supernova is unknown,
and has been the topic of debate for around a half century.
“As usual for normal supernovae, Type Ia supernovae produce
“metals”—or, in astronomical terms, chemical elements heavier than
hydrogen and helium, the latter pair tracing their origin to the Big
Bang—but Type Ia supernovae produce different elements, such as
manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), and iron (Fe). These elemental abundances
can be measured in spectral features of nearby stars, which keep a
“record” of supernovae from the past, like fossils do in archaeology,’’
Kobayashi, who is also an associate professor at the University of
Hertfordshire in the United Kingdom, said. Therefore, the evolution of
elemental abundances in galaxies can provide a stringent constraint on
the true origin of Type Ia supernovae.
The progenitor stars of Type Ia supernovae are a type of white dwarf
that are made of carbon and oxygen. White dwarfs form after the deaths
of intermediate-mass stars, where electron degeneracy pressure supports
the star against collapsing under its own gravity. However, if a white
dwarf exceeds its upper mass limit—also called the Chandrasekhar mass
limit (named after physicist Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar)—this leads to
nuclear reactions that cause it to explode.
Therefore, in a binary system containing a near-Chandrasekhar-mass
white dwarf, mass accretion from a companion star can cause an
explosion, which is one of the two proposed scenarios (the “single
degenerate scenario”) for Type Ia supernovae (Figure 1a). In the other
scenario, two white dwarfs are formed in a binary system (the “double
degenerate scenario”), which merge together to cause an
explosion—namely, a sub-Chandrasekhar-mass explosion (Figure 1b).
Click here for Figure 1 (with a white background).
To investigate both cases, the research team run
detailed calculations (2-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations and
nucleosynthesis) of both near-Chandrasekhar-mass and
sub-Chandrasekhar-mass explosions, and calculated the evolution of the
Milky Way Galaxy, something that had not been done in previous
research.
“Between these two cases, we find a critical difference in the
evolution of elemental abundances, in particular for the element
manganese,’’ Kobayashi explained. In the first simulation, the explosion
provided high-temperature and high-density matter where a lot of
manganese was produced, while in the second simulation, there was no
such matter and hence not enough manganese was produced.
The research team then incorporated the production amount of each
chemical element into their galaxy model to predict the evolution of
elements in the Milky Way. Compared to observational data, namely,
elemental abundances measured in nearby stars with high-resolution
spectroscopy, they found that at least 75 percent of Type Ia supernovae
are near-Chandrasekhar mass explosions (Figure 2). In both cases, the
research found, the produced iron mass is roughly the same—that is, 60
percent of the mass of the Sun—which is about 10 times larger than in
normal supernovae from massive stars.
“The chemical evolution of galaxies is powerful for solving
long-standing problems in nuclear astrophysics. Not only manganese but
also nickel abundances are updated in our calculations with the latest
nuclear reactions. Nickel was overproduced in previous calculations, but
now the predicted abundance is consistent with observations,’’
Kobayashi added. As a result of their findings, the nickel
overproduction problem is finally solved, after two decades of studies.
More interestingly, the research team also showed that a larger
contribution from sub-Chandrasekhar-mass explosions is preferred to
near-Chandrasekhar-mass explosions from the available observations in
different galaxies—dwarf spheroidal galaxies around the Milky Way, for
example.
Kobayashi and her team noted that the elemental abundances of
millions of stars will be obtained with ongoing and future international
projects, such as APOGEE (Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution
Experiment), HERMES-GALAH (GALactic Archeology with HERMES), WEAVE (WHT
Enhanced Area Velocity Explorer), 4MOST (4-metre Multi-Object
Spectroscopic Telescope), MSE (The Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer), in
the new research area of “Galactic Archaeology,” or the study of the
history of the Milky Way Galaxy, and their findings will be tested
further in future research.
Paper details:
Journal: The Astrophysical Journal
Title: New Type Ia Supernova Yields and the Manganese and Nickel Problems in the Milky Way and Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies
Authors: Chiaki Kobayashi (1,2), Shing-Chi Leung (2,3), Ken'ichi Nomoto (2)
Author affiliation:
1. Center for Astrophysics Research, Department of Physics, Astronomy
and Mathemat-ics, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield
AL10 9AB, UK
2. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe
(WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The
University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan
3. TAPIR, Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics, Mailcode 350-17, Caltech, Pasa-dena, CA 91125, USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab8e44 (Posted on June 4, 2020)
Paper abstract: (Astrophysical Journal page): https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab8e44
Preprint (arXiv.org page): https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09980
Research contact:
Ken’ichi Nomoto
Senior Scientist
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, University of Tokyo
E-mail: nomoto@astron.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
TEL: +81-4-7136-5940
Chiaki Kobayashi
Associate Professor
University of Hertfordshire
Visiting Scientist
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, University of Tokyo
E-mail: c.kobayashi@herts.ac.uk
Media contact:
John Amari
Press officer
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, The University of Tokyo
E-mail: press@ipmu.jp
TEL: 080-4056-2767
Related links:
Gold in the cosmos is an astronomical mystery (University of Hertfordshire press release, English)*
https://www.herts.ac.uk/about-us/media-centre/news/2020/gold-in-the-cosmos-is-an-astronomical-mystery
*Contents related to the research results, by Kavli IPMU Visiting
Scientist Chiaki Koba-yashi, published in the Astrophysical Journal on
September 16, 2020