The Times They Are A-Changin’: Searching for Shifts in Variable Star Light Curves

A field of stars near the center of the Milky Way that contains several ancient variable stars called RR Lyrae stars.
Credit: ESO/VVV Survey/D. Minniti; CC BY 4.0

Figure 1: An example of the Blazhko effect. Each panel shows data from ZTF for the same source for different seasons (at different times). The best-fit pulsation model for the total data set is shown in red. Over time, the actual pulsation of the source (black data) varies significantly from the average best fit due to Blazhko modulation. Adapted from Donev and Ivezić 2025

Figure 2: A simulated Lomb–Scargle periodogram made using the sum of two sine functions with similar, but different, frequencies. Note the primary peak at the frequencies’ mean, and the smaller side peaks indicating the difference. Adapted from Donev and Ivezić 2025

---

Title: Search for the Blazhko Effect in Field RR Lyrae Stars Using LINEAR and ZTF Light Curves
Authors: Ema Donev and Željko Ivezić
First Author’s Institution: XV. Gymnasium (MIOC)
Status: Published in AJ

RR Lyrae stars are a class of pulsating variable stars — similar to better-known Cepheid variables — that sit on the horizontal branch of the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram. Because of the regularity with which they pulsate, these stars are useful for a number of scientific applications, including standard-candle distancing (helping astronomers set the scale of distances in the universe) and as probes of very old star formation in nearby populations (because most RR Lyrae stars are at least 10 billion years old).

Today’s article studies the Blazhko effect in RR Lyrae stars. Simply put, the Blazhko effect is a long-term change of the duration (period) or strength (amplitude) of pulsation in some RR Lyrae variables. Fig. 1 shows an example from today’s article. While this effect was first observed as early as 1907, the physical mechanism for Blazhko modulation is still formally unknown, as is the percentage of RR Lyrae stars that exhibit it. Broadly speaking, there are three explanations for this effect: 1) nonlinear resonance between a star’s primary pulsation mode and some higher-level pulsation, 2) magnetic influence, or 3) cycles in the convection activity.

Today’s article searches for and identifies a population of Blazhko stars that may be used for future research into the Blazhko effect. Using data from the Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) asteroid survey and the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) survey, the authors analyze around 2,857 RR Lyrae stars found in both data sets. The LINEAR survey was taken over a period of about 6 years, and the ZTF survey over about 5 years. On average, there is a 15-year difference between the LINEAR and ZTF observations. Using both, therefore, allows the authors to search for Blazhko modulation in each survey individually, as well as to compare between the two over the 15-year period. They additionally require a source to have at least 150 data points in both surveys to be considered.

From this initial set of RR Lyrae stars, today’s article identifies 531 potential Blazhko star candidates that are moved on to a visual inspection step. In order to identify the candidates for visual inspection, the authors establish two pre-selection methods based on the direct light curve and periodogram for each source:

• Light curve selection works by algorithmically assigning a score to each source, with higher scores indicating a greater expectation that the source is a Blazhko RR Lyrae star. The scores are associated with best-fit pulsation models. One way a given source could earn points was by having a very high reduced χ² statistic in one or both data sets. Blazhko modulation changes the characteristics of the pulsations over time, meaning the best-fit model will be a poor fit to many of the pulsations within one or both data sets. Generally, poorer fits mean higher reduced χ² values. In addition, candidates could earn points by having a moderately high reduced χ² statistic in one or both data sets, as well as a significant change in pulsation characteristics of the best fit model from one data set to the next. Such a change between data sets is an indication of long-term Blazhko modulation. From this 479 of the 531 candidates are identified.


• Periodogram selection works by looking for interactions between the primary pulsation and Blazhko frequencies. First, the authors create a periodogram for the time-series data. In short, a periodogram plots a number of possible frequencies (or periods) of variability in the data versus the “power” associated with that frequency (or period), where higher power means the data vary more strongly at that frequency. When periodic data have only one associated frequency, the periodogram will show a single peak with high power. In the case where there are two effects of variation (in this case, the pulsation of the star and the Blazhko modulation) with disparate frequencies, a single, large peak will occur at the average frequency, with a smaller peak appearing to either side. Fig. 2 shows an example using simulated data. By identifying the location and strength of these side peaks, the authors are able to identify a handful of additional Blazhko sources (29), as well as estimate the frequencies of Blazhko modulation.

From here, the authors visually inspect the 531 candidates and confirm that 228 of them exhibit convincing evidence of the Blazhko effect. They are able to place a lower limit on the percentage of RR Lyrae stars that are Blazhko sources at 11.4 ± 0.8%. In addition, they report that for a certain subclass of RR Lyrae stars, those that show the Blazhko effect have pulsation periods 5% shorter on average but no significant difference in amplitude. But a less common subclass of RR Lyrae stars shows no significant difference in period or amplitude when comparing Blazhko sources to the general population. Finally, the authors highlight that some sources show Blazhko modulation in one data set, but not the other, indicating that the modulation itself may change over time. Further research into this finding may help us better identify the most likely physical mechanism(s) for the Blazhko effect.

Original astrobite edited by Kylee Carden

Source: American Astronomical Society/AAS-Nova

---

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

---

About the author, Catherine Slaughter:

Catherine is a PhD candidate in astrophysics at the University of Minnesota. Her research primarily deals with stellar population astrophysics in local dwarf galaxies, with particular focus on the intersection between computational and observational research methods. Prior to moving to Minnesota, she completed her BA in Physics and Astronomy, and MSc in Astronomy Research at Leiden University.

---

Hubble sees white dwarf eating piece of Pluto-like objec

Illustration of a cataclysmic variable system, in which a star donates mass to a closely orbiting white-dwarf.
Credit: M.Weiss/Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian

Astronomers have discovered the most compact cataclysmic variable system containing a strongly magnetized white dwarf. The extreme closeness of the system suggests that the companion may be a metal-poor star — the first time such a star has been paired with a strongly magnetized white dwarf.

Meet the Cataclysmic Variable

Cataclysmic variables are binary star systems that contain a white dwarf and a companion star in uncomfortably close quarters. In these systems, the companion star transfers gas to the white dwarf, resulting in sudden, irregular, and often repeated outbursts as the stolen gas ignites on the scorching surface of the white dwarf.

These bound-together stars typically orbit one another on orbits ranging from about 80 minutes to 10 hours. Though theorists place the minimum orbital period around 76 minutes, a handful of cataclysmic variable systems have cropped up with periods below this limit. The systems that have limboed under the limit are thought to have stellar companions that are more compact than typical main-sequence stars, allowing the white dwarf to nestle in closer.

Phase-folded light curves for Gaia19bxc from the Caltech HIgh-speed Multi-colour camERA (CHIMERA) on the Hale Telescope. The double-peaked light curve is evidence for cyclotron beaming, which occurs in strongly magnetized white dwarfs. Adapted from Galiullin et al. 2025

Exploring Below the Limit

Discovered in 2019 by the Gaia spacecraft, Gaia19bxc is a cataclysmic variable that fluctuates with a period of 64.42 minutes. If this variability is linked to the orbital period of the system, that would place it well below the theoretical minimum period. Adding to the intrigue, early observations also hinted that Gaia19bxc’s white dwarf is strongly magnetic, making the system what’s called a polar. In polar systems, the white dwarf’s magnetic field diverts the accreted matter toward the white dwarf’s poles as it is collected, rather than into a disk around the white dwarf’s equator.

Now, Ilkham Galiullin (Kazan Federal University) and collaborators have analyzed photometry and spectra of Gaia19bxc from the Zwicky Transient Facility, the Hale Telescope, and the Keck I telescope to investigate the nature of this unusual system.

The team’s analysis confirmed that the stars of Gaia19bxc orbit one another every 64.42 minutes, cementing the system’s place below the period minimum for typical cataclysmic variables. The system’s double-peaked light curves and evidence for an accretion stream — rather than an accretion disk — confirm the system’s polar nature, implying a magnetic field strength greater than 10 million Gauss. This makes Gaia19bxc the most closely orbiting system to contain a strongly magnetized white dwarf.

Gaia19bxc’s orbital period compared to known polar cataclysmic variables (gray) as well as the theorized minimum periods for systems containing a metal-poor (Pop II) companion (cyan) and an evolved companion (blue). Credit: Galiullin et al. 2025

A Sign of Discoveries to Come

These observations illuminate the nature of the white dwarf — but what about the companion star?

Galiullin and coauthors saw no evidence for metal lines in Gaia19bxc’s spectrum, nor did they see spectral features arising from a hot companion star. These findings suggest that the companion is an old, cool, compact, metal-poor star, which would make Gaia19bxc the first known polar to contain a metal-poor star. It’s also one of only a handful of cataclysmic variables to contain a metal-poor star and be below the theoretical period minimum.

Though Gaia19bxc is currently in a class of its own, it may not be for long; with the start of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time rapidly approaching, many more cataclysmic variable systems as faint as or fainter than Gaia19bxc may soon be discovered.

By Kerry Hensley

Citation

“Optical Spectroscopy of the Most Compact Accreting Binary Harboring a Magnetic White Dwarf and a Hydrogen-Rich Donor,” Ilkham Galiullin et al 2025 ApJL 990 L57. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adff82

Source: American Astronomical Society/AAS-Nova

---

NASA Celebrates Edwin Hubble's Discovery of a New Universe

M31 Cepheid Variable Star V1
Credits/Image: NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage Project (STScI, AURA)
Acknowledgment: Robert Gendler

Compass Scale Image of V1 in M31
Credits/Image: NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage Project (STScI, AURA)

Cepheid Variable Star V1 in Andromeda Galaxy
Credits/Image: NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage Project (STScI, AURA)
Acknowledgment: Robert Gendler

---

For humans, the most important star in the universe is our Sun. The second-most important star is nestled inside the Andromeda galaxy. Don't go looking for it — the flickering star is 2.2 million light-years away, and is 1/100,000th the brightness of the faintest star visible to the human eye.

Yet, a century ago, its discovery by Edwin Hubble, then an astronomer at Carnegie Observatories, opened humanity's eyes as to how large the universe really is, and revealed that our Milky Way galaxy is just one of hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe ushered in the coming-of-age for humans as a curious species that could scientifically ponder our own creation through the message of starlight. Carnegie Science and NASA are celebrating this centennial at the 245th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Washington, D.C.

The seemingly inauspicious star, simply named V1, flung open a Pandora's box full of mysteries about time and space that are still challenging astronomers today. Using the largest telescope in the world at that time, the Carnegie-funded 100-inch Hooker Telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory in California, Hubble discovered the demure star in 1923. This rare type of pulsating star, called a Cepheid variable, is used as milepost markers for distant celestial objects. There are no tape-measures in space, but by the early 20th century Henrietta Swan Leavitt had discovered that the pulsation period of Cepheid variables is directly tied to their luminosity.

Many astronomers long believed that the edge of the Milky Way marked the edge of the entire universe. But Hubble determined that V1, located inside the Andromeda "nebula," was at a distance that far exceeded anything in our own Milky Way galaxy. This led Hubble to the jaw-dropping realization that the universe extends far beyond our own galaxy.

In fact Hubble had suspected there was a larger universe out there, but here was the proof in the pudding. He was so amazed he scribbled an exclamation mark on the photographic plate of Andromeda that pinpointed the variable star.

As a result, the science of cosmology exploded almost overnight. Hubble's contemporary, the distinguished Harvard astronomer Harlow Shapley, upon Hubble notifying him of the discovery, was devastated. "Here is the letter that destroyed my universe," he lamented to fellow astronomer Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin, who was in his office when he opened Hubble's message.

Just three years earlier, Shapley had presented his observational interpretation of a much smaller universe in a debate one evening at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History in Washington. He maintained that the Milky Way galaxy was so huge, it must encompass the entirety of the universe. Shapley insisted that the mysteriously fuzzy "spiral nebulae," such as Andromeda, were simply stars forming on the periphery of our Milky Way, and inconsequential.

Little could Hubble have imagined that 70 years later, an extraordinary telescope named after him, lofted hundreds of miles above the Earth, would continue his legacy. The marvelous telescope made "Hubble" a household word, synonymous with wonderous astronomy.

Today, NASA's Hubble Space Telescope pushes the frontiers of knowledge over 10 times farther than Edwin Hubble could ever see. The space telescope has lifted the curtain on a compulsive universe full of active stars, colliding galaxies, and runaway black holes, among the celestial fireworks of the interplay between matter and energy.

Edwin Hubble was the first astronomer to take the initial steps that would ultimately lead to the Hubble Space Telescope, revealing a seemingly infinite ocean of galaxies. He thought that, despite their abundance, galaxies came in just a few specific shapes: pinwheel spirals, football-shaped ellipticals, and oddball irregular galaxies. He thought these might be clues to galaxy evolution – but the answer had to wait for the Hubble Space Telescope's legendary Hubble Deep Field in 1994.

The most impactful finding that Edwin Hubble's analysis showed was that the farther the galaxy is, the faster it appears to be receding from Earth. The universe looked like it was expanding like a balloon. This was based on Hubble tying galaxy distances to the reddening of light — the redshift – that proportionally increased the father away the galaxies are.

The redshift data were first collected by Lowell Observatory astronomer Vesto Slipher, who spectroscopically studied the "spiral nebulae" a decade before Hubble. Slipher did not know they were extragalactic, but Hubble made the connection. Slipher first interpreted his redshift data an example of the Doppler effect. This phenomenon is caused by light being stretched to longer, redder wavelengths if a source is moving away from us. To Slipher, it was curious that all the spiral nebulae appeared to be moving away from Earth.

Two years prior to Hubble publishing his findings, the Belgian physicist and Jesuit priest Georges Lemaître analyzed the Hubble and Slifer observations and first came to the conclusion of an expanding universe. This proportionality between galaxies' distances and redshifts is today termed Hubble–Lemaître's law. Because the universe appeared to be uniformly expanding, Lemaître further realized that the expansion rate could be run back into time – like rewinding a movie – until the universe was unimaginably small, hot and dense. It wasn't until 1949 that the term "big bang" came into fashion.

This was a relief to Edwin Hubble's contemporary, Albert Einstein, who deduced the universe could not remain stationary without imploding under gravity's pull. The rate of cosmic expansion is now known as the Hubble Constant

Ironically, Hubble himself never fully accepted the runaway universe as an interpretation of the redshift data. He suspected that some unknown physics phenomenon was giving the illusion that the galaxies were flying away from each other. He was partly right in that Einstein's theory of special relativity explained redshift as an effect of time-dilation that is proportional to the stretching of expanding space. The galaxies only appear to be zooming through the universe. Space is expanding instead.

After decades of precise measurements, the Hubble telescope came along to nail down the expansion rate precisely, giving the universe an age of 13.8 billion years. This required establishing the first rung of what astronomers call the "cosmic distance ladder" needed to build a yardstick to far-flung galaxies. They are cousins to V1, Cepheid variable stars that the Hubble telescope can detect out to over 100 times farther from Earth than the star Edwin Hubble first found.

Astrophysics was turned on its head again in 1998 when the Hubble telescope and other observatories discovered that the universe was expanding at an ever-faster rate, through a phenomenon dubbed "dark energy." Einstein first toyed with this idea of a repulsive form of gravity in space, calling it the cosmological constant

Even more mysteriously, the current expansion rate appears to be different than what modern cosmological models of the developing universe would predict, further confounding theoreticians. Today astronomers are wrestling with the idea that whatever is accelerating the universe may be changing over time. NASA's Roman Space Telescope, with the ability to do large cosmic surveys, should lead to new insights into the behavior of dark matter and dark energy. Roman will likely measure the Hubble constant via lensed supernovae.

This grand century-long adventure, plumbing depths of the unknown, began with Hubble photographing a large smudge of light, the Andromeda galaxy, at the Mount Wilson Observatory high above Los Angeles.

In short, Edwin Hubble is the man who wiped away the ancient universe and discovered a new universe that would shrink humanity's self-perception into being an insignificant speck in the cosmos.

The Hubble Space Telescope has been operating for over three decades and continues to make ground-breaking discoveries that shape our fundamental understanding of the universe. Hubble is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope and mission operations. Lockheed Martin Space, based in Denver, also supports mission operations at Goddard. The Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, conducts Hubble science operations for NASA.

Source: HubbleSite/News

---

About This Release

Credits: Media Contact:

Ray Villard
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland

Permissions: Content Use Policy

Contact Us: Direct inquiries to the News Team.

Related Links and Documents

• NASA's Hubble Portal
• Hubble Views the Star that Changed the Universe (STScI-PR2011-15)
• Carnegie Science's Release

---

How NASA's Roman Telescope Will Measure Ages of Stars

Sunspots
Credits: Image: NASA

Simulated Light Curve for Star with Starspots
Credits: Image: NASA, Ralf Crawford (STScI)

Rotating Sun with Sunspots (Video)
Credits: Video: NASA

Images

---

Guessing your age might be a popular carnival game, but for astronomers it’s a real challenge to determine the ages of stars. Once a star like our Sun has settled into steady nuclear fusion, or the mature phase of its life, it changes little for billions of years. One exception to that rule is the star’s rotation period – how quickly it spins. By measuring the rotation periods of hundreds of thousands of stars, NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope promises to bring new understandings of stellar populations in our Milky Way galaxy after it launches by May 2027.

Stars are born spinning rapidly. However, stars of our Sun’s mass or smaller will gradually slow down over billions of years. That slowdown is caused by interactions between a stream of charged particles known as the stellar wind and the star’s own magnetic field. The interactions remove angular momentum, causing the star to spin more slowly, much like an ice skater will slow down when they extend their arms.

This effect, called magnetic braking, varies depending on the strength of the star’s magnetic field. Faster-spinning stars have stronger magnetic fields, which causes them to slow down more rapidly. Due to the influence of these magnetic fields, after about one billion years stars of the same mass and age will spin at the same rate. Therefore, if you know a star’s mass and rotation rate, you potentially can estimate its age. By knowing the ages of a large population of stars, we can study how our galaxy formed and evolved over time.

Measuring Stellar Rotation

How do astronomers measure the rotation rate of a distant star? They look for changes in the star’s brightness due to starspots. Starspots, like sunspots on our Sun, are cooler, darker patches on a star’s surface. When a starspot is in view, the star will be slightly dimmer than when the spot is on the far side of the star.

If a star has a single, large spot on it, it would experience a regular pattern of dimming and brightening as the spot rotated in and out of view. (This dimming can be differentiated from a similar effect caused by a transiting exoplanet.) But a star can have dozens of spots scattered across its surface at any one time, and those spots vary over time, making it much more difficult to tease out periodic signals of dimming from the star’s rotation.

Applying Artificial Intelligence

A team of astronomers at the University of Florida is developing new techniques to extract a rotation period from measurements of a star’s brightness over time, through a program funded by NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope project.

They are using a type of artificial intelligence known as a convolutional neural network to analyze light curves, or plots of a star’s brightness over time. To do this, the neural network first must be trained on simulated light curves. University of Florida postdoctoral associate Zachary Claytor, the science principal investigator on the project, wrote a program called “butterpy” to generate such light curves.

“This program lets the user set a number of variables, like the star’s rotation rate, the number of spots, and spot lifetimes. Then it will calculate how spots emerge, evolve, and decay as the star rotates and convert that spot evolution to a light curve – what we would measure from a distance,” explained Claytor.

The team has already applied their trained neural network to data from NASA's TESS (Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite). Systematic effects make it more challenging to accurately measure longer stellar rotation periods, yet the team’s trained neural network was able to accurately measure these longer rotation periods using the TESS data.

Roman’s Star Survey

The upcoming Roman Space Telescope will gather data from hundreds of millions of stars through its Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey, one of three core community surveys it will conduct. Roman will look toward our galaxy’s center – a region crowded with stars – to measure how many of these stars change in brightness over time. These measurements will enable multiple science investigations, from searching for distant exoplanets to determining the stars’ rotation rates.

The specific survey design is still being developed by the astronomical community. The NASA-funded study on stellar rotation promises to help inform potential survey strategies.

“We can test which things matter and what we can pull out of the Roman data depending on different survey strategies. So when we actually get the data, we’ll already have a plan,” said Jamie Tayar, assistant professor of astronomy at the University of Florida and the program's principal investigator.

“We have a lot of the tools already, and we think they can be adapted to Roman,” she added.

The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is managed at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, with participation by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Caltech/IPAC in Southern California, the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, and a science team comprising scientists from various research institutions. The primary industrial partners are Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corporation in Boulder, Colorado; L3Harris Technologies in Melbourne, Florida; and Teledyne Scientific & Imaging in Thousand Oaks, California.

Source: Space Telescope Science Institute/Press Releases

---

About This Release

Credits:

Media Contact:

Christine Pulliam
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland

Science: Jamie Tayar (University of Florida), Zachary Claytor (University of Florida)

Permissions: Content Use Policy

Related Links and Documents

• Resource: Abstract: "Spots, Faculae, and Ages: The Promise of Rotation with Roman and Deep Learning", PDF (208.58 KB)

---

Hubble Finds that Betelgeuse's Mysterious Dimming Is Due to a Traumatic Outburst

Illustration of Outburst from Betelgeuse  

Artwork: NASA , ESA, and E. Wheatley (STScI)
Science: A. Dupree (CfA)

Betelgeuse Magnesium II Spectrum Diagram 

Artwork: NASAESA, and E. Wheatley (STScI)

Release images

 Hubble Detects Dense, Heated Material Moving Through the Star's Atmosphere

Observations by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope are showing that the unexpected dimming of the supergiant star Betelgeuse was most likely caused by an immense amount of hot material ejected into space, forming a dust cloud that blocked starlight coming from Betelgeuse's surface.

Hubble researchers suggest that the dust cloud formed when superhot plasma unleashed from an welling of a large convection cell on the star's surface passed through the hot atmosphere to the colder outer layers, where it cooled and formed dust grains. The resulting dust cloud blocked light from about a quarter of the star's surface, beginning in late 2019. By April 2020, the star returned to normal brightness.

Betelgeuse is an aging, red supergiant star that has swelled in size due to complex, evolving changes in its nuclear fusion furnace at the core. The star is so huge now that if it replaced the Sun at the center of our solar system, its outer surface would extend past the orbit of Jupiter.

The unprecedented phenomenon for Betelgeuse's great dimming, eventually noticeable to even the naked eye, started in October 2019. By mid-February 2020, the monster star had lost more than two-thirds of its brilliance.

This sudden dimming has mystified astronomers, who scrambled to develop several theories for the abrupt change. One idea was that a huge, cool, dark "star spot" covered a wide patch of the visible surface. But the Hubble observations, led by Andrea Dupree, associate director of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian (CfA), Cambridge, Massachusetts, suggest a dust cloud covering a portion of the star.

Several months of Hubble's ultraviolet-light spectroscopic observations of Betelgeuse, beginning in January 2019, yield a timeline leading up to the darkening. These observations provide important new clues to the mechanism behind the dimming.

Hubble captured signs of dense, heated material moving through the star's atmosphere in September, October, and November 2019. Then, in December, several ground-based telescopes observed the star decreasing in brightness in its southern hemisphere.

“With Hubble, we see the material as it left the star’s visible surface and moved out through the atmosphere, before the dust formed that caused the star to appear to dim,” Dupree said. “We could see the effect of a dense, hot region in the southeast part of the star moving outward.

"This material was two to four times more luminous than the star's normal brightness," she continued. "And then, about a month later, the south part of Betelgeuse dimmed conspicuously as the star grew fainter. We think it is possible that a dark cloud resulted from the outflow that Hubble detected. Only Hubble gives us this evidence that led up to the dimming."

The team's paper will appear online Aug. 13 in The Astrophysical Journal.

Massive supergiant stars like Betelgeuse are important because they expel heavy elements such as carbon into space that become the building blocks of new generations of stars. Carbon is also a basic ingredient for life as we know it.

Tracing a Traumatic Outburst

Dupree's team began using Hubble early last year to analyze the behemoth star. Their observations are part of a three-year Hubble study to monitor variations in the star's outer atmosphere. Betelgeuse is a variable star that expands and contracts, brightening and dimming, on a 420-day cycle.

Hubble's ultraviolet-light sensitivity allowed researchers to probe the layers above the star's surface, which are so hot — more than 20,000 degrees Fahrenheit — they cannot be detected at visible wavelengths. These layers are heated partly by the star's turbulent convection cells bubbling up to the surface.

Hubble spectra, taken in early and late 2019, and in 2020, probed the star's outer atmosphere by measuring magnesium II (singly ionized magnesium) lines. In September through November 2019, the researchers measured material moving about 200,000 miles per hour passing from the star's surface into its outer atmosphere.

This hot, dense material continued to travel beyond Betelgeuse's visible surface, reaching millions of miles from the seething star. At that distance, the material cooled down enough to form dust, the researchers said.

This interpretation is consistent with Hubble ultraviolet-light observations in February 2020, which showed that the behavior of the star's outer atmosphere returned to normal, even though visible-light images showed that it was still dimming.

Although Dupree does not know the outburst's cause, she thinks it was aided by the star's pulsation cycle, which continued normally though the event, as recorded by visible-light observations. The paper's co-author, Klaus Strassmeier, of the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, used the institute's automated telescope called STELLar Activity (STELLA), to measure changes in the velocity of the gas on the star's surface as it rose and fell during the pulsation cycle. The star was expanding in its cycle at the same time as the upwelling of the convective cell. The pulsation rippling outward from Betelgeuse may have helped propel the outflowing plasma through the atmosphere.

Dupree estimates that about two times the normal amount of material from the southern hemisphere was lost over the three months of the outburst. Betelgeuse, like all stars, is losing mass all the time, in this case at a rate 30 million times higher than the Sun.

Betelgeuse is so close to Earth, and so large, that Hubble has been able to resolve surface features – making it the only such star, except for our Sun, where surface detail can be seen.

Hubble images taken by Dupree in 1995 first revealed a mottled surface containing massive convection cells that shrink and swell, which cause them to darken and brighten. 

A supernova precursor?

The red supergiant is destined to end its life in a supernova blast. Some astronomers think the sudden dimming may be a pre-supernova event. The star is relatively nearby, about 725 light-years away, which means the dimming would have happened around the year 1300. But its light is just reaching Earth now.

"No one knows what a star does right before it goes supernova, because it's never been observed," Dupree explained. "Astronomers have sampled stars maybe a year ahead of them going supernova, but not within days or weeks before it happened. 

Dupree will get another chance to observe the star with Hubble in late August or early September. Right now, Betelgeuse is in the daytime sky, too close to the Sun for Hubble observations. But NASA's Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO)  has taken images of the monster star from its location in space. Those observations how that Betelgeuse dimmed again from mid-May to mid-July, although not as dramatically as earlier in the year.

Dupree hopes to use STEREO for more follow-up observations to monitor Betelgeuse's brightness. Her plan is to observe Betelgeuse again next year with STEREO when the star has expanded outward again in its cycle to see if it unleashes another petulant outburst.

Source: HubleSite/ News

 

---

 

Contacts

Donna Weaver / Ray Villard
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
410-338-4493 / 410-338-4514
dweaver@stsci.edu / villard@stsci.edu

Andrea Dupree
CfA | Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge, Massachusetts
617-495-7489
adupree@cfa.harvard.edu

 

---

 

Related links

• The science paper by A. Dupree et al.
• NASA's Hubble Portal
• ESA/Hubble's Release
• NASA Goddard's STEREO Betelgeuse Release
• NASA's Hubble Betelgeuse Release
• CfA's Release
• Leibniz AIP's Release
• STScI's Betelgeuse Release (1996) 

 

---

Hubble and Gaia Team Up to Fuel Cosmic Conundrum

Using two of the world’s most powerful space telescopes — NASA’s Hubble and ESA’s Gaia — astronomers have made the most precise measurements to date of the universe’s expansion rate. This is calculated by gauging the distances between nearby galaxies using special types of stars called Cepheid variables as cosmic yardsticks. By comparing their intrinsic brightness as measured by Hubble, with their apparent brightness as seen from Earth, scientists can calculate their distances. Gaia further refines this yardstick by geometrically measuring the distances to Cepheid variables within our Milky Way galaxy. This allowed astronomers to more precisely calibrate the distances to Cepheids that are seen in outside galaxies.  Science: NASA, ESA, and A. Riess (STScI/JHU)

Using the power and synergy of two space telescopes, astronomers have made the most precise measurement to date of the universe’s expansion rate.

The results further fuel the mismatch between measurements for the expansion rate of the nearby universe, and those of the distant, primeval universe — before stars and galaxies even existed.

This so-called “tension” implies that there could be new physics underlying the foundations of the universe. Possibilities include the interaction strength of dark matter, dark energy being even more exotic than previously thought, or an unknown new particle in the tapestry of space.

Combining observations from NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope and the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Gaia space observatory, astronomers further refined the previous value for the Hubble constant, the rate at which the universe is expanding from the big bang 13.8 billion years ago.

But as the measurements have become more precise, the team’s determination of the Hubble constant has become more and more at odds with the measurements from another space observatory, ESA’s Planck mission, which is coming up with a different predicted value for the Hubble constant.

Planck mapped the primeval universe as it appeared only 360,000 years after the big bang. The entire sky is imprinted with the signature of the big bang encoded in microwaves. Planck measured the sizes of the ripples in this Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) that were produced by slight irregularities in the big bang fireball. The fine details of these ripples encode how much dark matter and normal matter there is, the trajectory of the universe at that time, and other cosmological parameters.

These measurements, still being assessed, allow scientists to predict how the early universe would likely have evolved into the expansion rate we can measure today. However, those predictions don’t seem to match the new measurements of our nearby contemporary universe.

“With the addition of this new Gaia and Hubble Space Telescope data, we now have a serious tension with the Cosmic Microwave Background data,” said Planck team member and lead analyst George Efstathiou of the Kavli Institute for Cosmology in Cambridge, England, who was not involved with the new work.

“The tension seems to have grown into a full-blown incompatibility between our views of the early and late time universe,” said team leader and Nobel Laureate Adam Riess of the Space Telescope Science Institute and the Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. “At this point, clearly it’s not simply some gross error in any one measurement. It’s as though you predicted how tall a child would become from a growth chart and then found the adult he or she became greatly exceeded the prediction. We are very perplexed.”

In 2005, Riess and members of the SHOES (Supernova H₀ for the Equation of State) Team set out to measure the universe’s expansion rate with unprecedented accuracy. In the following years, by refining their techniques, this team shaved down the rate measurement’s uncertainty to unprecedented levels. Now, with the power of Hubble and Gaia combined, they have reduced that uncertainty to just 2.2 percent.

Because the Hubble constant is needed to estimate the age of the universe, the long-sought answer is one of the most important numbers in cosmology. It is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble, who nearly a century ago discovered that the universe was uniformly expanding in all directions—a finding that gave birth to modern cosmology.

Galaxies appear to recede from Earth proportional to their distances, meaning that the farther away they are, the faster they appear to be moving away. This is a consequence of expanding space, and not a value of true space velocity. By measuring the value of the Hubble constant over time, astronomers can construct a picture of our cosmic evolution, infer the make-up of the universe, and uncover clues concerning its ultimate fate.

The two major methods of measuring this number give incompatible results. One method is direct, building a cosmic “distance ladder” from measurements of stars in our local universe. The other method uses the CMB to measure the trajectory of the universe shortly after the Big Bang and then uses physics to describe the universe and extrapolate to the present expansion rate. Together, the measurements should provide an end-to-end test of our basic understanding of the so-called “Standard Model” of the universe. However, the pieces don’t fit
.

Using Hubble and newly released data from Gaia, Riess’ team measured the present rate of expansion to be 73.5 kilometers (45.6 miles) per second per megaparsec. This means that for every 3.3 million light-years farther away a galaxy is from us, it appears to be moving 73.5 kilometers per second faster. However, the Planck results predict the universe should be expanding today at only 67.0 kilometers (41.6 miles) per second per megaparsec. As the teams’ measurements have become more and more precise, the chasm between them has continued to widen, and is now about 4 times the size of their combined uncertainty.

Over the years, Riess’ team has refined the Hubble constant value by streamlining and strengthening the “cosmic distance ladder,” used to measure precise distances to nearby and far-off galaxies. They compared those distances with the expansion of space, measured by the stretching of light from nearby galaxies. Using the apparent outward velocity at each distance, they then calculated the Hubble constant.

To gauge the distances between nearby galaxies, his team used a special type of star as cosmic yardsticks or milepost markers. These pulsating stars, called Cepheid variables, brighten and dim at rates that correspond to their intrinsic brightness. By comparing their intrinsic brightness with their apparent brightness as seen from Earth, scientists can calculate their distances.

Gaia further refined this yardstick by geometrically measuring the distance to 50 Cepheid variables in the Milky Way. These measurements were combined with precise measurements of their brightnesses from Hubble. This allowed the astronomers to more accurately calibrate the Cepheids and then use those seen outside the Milky Way as milepost markers.

“When you use Cepheids, you need both distance and brightness,” explained Riess. Hubble provided the information on brightness, and Gaia provided the parallax information needed to accurately determine the distances. Parallax is the apparent change in an object’s position due to a shift in the observer’s point of view. Ancient Greeks first used this technique to measure the distance from Earth to the Moon.

“Hubble is really amazing as a general-purpose observatory, but Gaia is the new gold standard for calibrating distance. It is purpose-built for measuring parallax—this is what it was designed to do,” Stefano Casertano of Space Telescope Science Institute and a member of the SHOES Team added. “Gaia brings a new ability to recalibrate all past distance measures, and it seems to confirm our previous work. We get the same answer for the Hubble constant if we replace all previous calibrations of the distance ladder with just the Gaia parallaxes. It’s a crosscheck between two very powerful and precise observatories.”

The goal of Riess’ team is to work with Gaia to cross the threshold of refining the Hubble constant to a value of only one percent by the early 2020s. Meanwhile, astrophysicists will likely continue to grapple with revisiting their ideas about the physics of the early universe.

The Riess team's latest results are published in the July 12 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope. The Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) in Baltimore, Maryland, conducts Hubble science operations. STScI is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, in Washington, D.C.

---

Related Links

This site is not responsible for content found on external links

• The science paper by A. Riess et al.
• NASA's Hubble Portal

---

Contacts

Ann Jenkins / Ray Villard
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
410-338-4488 / 410-338-4514
jenkins@stsci.edu/ villard@stsci.edu

Adam Riess
Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
410-516-4474
ariess@stsci.edu

Source: HubbleSite/News

---